Iam not interested in power oriented forces iam interested In
the power that support moral the right and the good the diferrence Is clearly visible.
The first statement assumes the influences is rewards rewards for the cynics
who are cunny and disdainful the second statement assumes influeces as reward
for people who are trustworthy and bring goodness
“ we communicate
to destroy others oi build others”
“technology
can destroy someone’s reputation faster and easier competed to before”
“ digital
communication allow us to reach more people faster and at less cost.”
That so many people are just good at talking rather than
being real leaders. In this day and age the opputunity to have influence is always there but most people. Just want to
convey their thoughts. This thing not
only give a bad preseden but also exacerbate
tension widening gap between meaning full masseging and collaboration
“ you and I both hate being subject
of critism, wheter we deserve it or not”
Although bad coment in blog, talk show and social media seemed
to be a passing impression. When you use a medium for critics. The target of
your critism is motivated to defend himself defensive, it is not much can you
do to break through the barriers created by other parties, he will be spetical
of what you say and even worse he will doubt it thus, critical comments are
like an invisible boomerang. The boomerang returns to head of the person who
threw it .
Yang paling penting
adalah memusatkan perhatian untuk mengembangkan diri anda bukan orang lain
Comments
Post a Comment